This project started in January 2017. My objective was to create a Naive Brush Lettering style based on the hand lettering of Monica Garwood.
I started by doing what I knew and pushing that towards a less consistent style. To do this I had to fight my tendency to start stokes heavy at the top and get lighter near the bottom. This lettering needed to start light and get heavier at the bottom. And it needed a lot of variation in letter size and weight.
This was just a start. The lettering wasn’t smooth flowing and effortless. That would take more practice so I could make it faster. I was finding out that
I kept at for a couple more months. I could see that it was progressing. Finally, I had to call it good. I’m happy with the end results. I also know I can always come back to it and make it even better.
Ta-da! My new Naive lettering style; fluid, playful, and a cool texture.
I’ve been making brush lettering a long time. It took me a few years to get good at it. It was all about consistency, rhythm, and flow. If you messed-up a letter or few, they’d stick out like a sore thumb. When I looked at my brush lettering or someone else’s, I’d be looking for inconsistencies. That’s how I judged how good it was. I did that for some time.
Perfect lettering – or it will be after a little digital clean-up.
Until….the hand lettering world started to change. “Casual” was the word used to describe the new style of lettering. The date this started is quite subjective, but I’ll say 2000. The new generation of lettering artists did’t bring the traditional calligraphy skills and they knew the computer well. Making “perfect” lettering wasn’t the objective. In fact, it was the reverse. Perfection wasn’t cool. Of course there was still a need for well done (perfect) lettering, but the trend for “imperfect” lettering had taken hold and is still going strong.
This article is concerned with brush lettering, but is should be noted that hand drawn letteringwas also a big part of the new Casual lettering style.
I’ve embraced the now-not-so-new Casual lettering. I even have a new name for it; naive. It looks easy and effortless to make. At least that’s what I thought. I created a project for myself to test my assumption. The style I really liked, and was going use as my inspiration, is by Monica Garwood. This is the piece I saw online and was drawn to:
I wanted to see if I could get that same playfulness and variation.
Do you ever see hand lettering and think “a kid could have done that”? It doesn’t appear as if there’s any real skill involved? I’ve asked myself that many times, especially since I spent years honing my lettering skills. My goal was to have consistent angles, widths, and spacing. If it wasn’t as “perfect” as possible, it wasn’t worthy of being used for anything.
Well, I’ve had to rethink all that. Perfection is good, it can also be boring. Given: some lettering does have to be perfect, if that’s the tone for how it’s being used. For example, would a fancy hotel, perfume, or jeweler take the chance that their brand looks sloppy, goofy, or just plain poorly done? I don’t think so.
On the other hand, say your client wants to appear youthful, daring, or cutting edge; now a little “imperfection” is a good thing. It gives it a human touch and the imperfections add interest; it’s not boring, it’s unique, and it’s definitely not a font.
But how far to go with the imperfections before the lettering starts to look sloppy or goofy? Well, that’s a judgement call and it’s not an easy one.
Naive hand lettering; the good, bad, and ugly.
One of these I really like. The other two don’t cut it.
As an experiment to help satisfy my doubts about how easy or hard it is to make naive lettering, I found lettering online that I really liked – because it was so naive. It was fun to look at. I got out my brushes and set to work on trying to mimic the style. I thought, “If I can make nice, consistent lettering with a brush, then making widely inconsistent lettering would be easy.”
How wrong I was. It is hard. Making “perfect” lettering involves getting into a rhythm and flow. Each stroke starts heavy and ends light. The letter and word spacing are consistent. Naive lettering required me to fight those tendencies. Now I didn’t want all that consistency. Some letters are heavy, some light; some letters are tightly spaced, others widely spaced; capital letters can mixed in. There is a rhythym, but it relies on inconsistency. Instead of thinking of the next letter having the same feel as the last one, I am forced to constantly think, “How do I make this letter different from the last?”
Well I did persevere, and I am happy with the results. But I’ll never look at naive hand lettering and think “that looks easy.”
https://i0.wp.com/dancotton.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/How-naive_622px_web2.png?fit=622%2C114114622Dan Cottonhttp://dancotton.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Sm_Seal_4-21-17png-02_web.pngDan Cotton2017-07-18 05:00:442017-07-19 18:36:22Hand Lettering Today - how naive is too naive?
About Dan Cotton
Dan Cotton is a letterer and type designer.
He provides lettering designs for businesses,
design studios, ad agencies, and corporations.